Buy Woobox Votes
Buy Woobox Votes. Real participants, unique IPs, pacing that matches the contest window.
Woobox counts a vote itself. It is a third-party contest app rather than a built-in Facebook or Instagram feature, so a click on a Woobox gallery's vote button never touches either platform's servers — it lands inside Woobox's own backend and gets logged against whatever counting rule the organiser switched on when the gallery was built. That separation is exactly why entrants and their supporters buy woobox votes for this app specifically: the number that decides a winner lives entirely in Woobox's dashboard, not in a Facebook reaction count or an Instagram like.
Because Woobox is the one keeping score, the organiser's setup choices matter more than the platform hosting the gallery. One campaign might allow a single vote per email address for the whole run, another resets every day per Facebook login, and a third adds a short verification step before a click is even accepted. None of that is visible from outside the gallery; it sits in settings only the organiser can see, which is why two Woobox contests can behave completely differently under an identical-looking vote button.
A Woobox gallery doesn't have to live on Facebook at all. Organisers can run it as a Page tab, as a standalone page on Woobox's own hosting, or embedded through an iframe on their own website, and the counting engine underneath stays the same in every case. Whichever surface a voter lands on, the click is processed by Woobox, which is the detail that makes this app worth treating as its own platform rather than an add-on to Facebook or Instagram.
Request an order
Contest link, number of votes, deadline. We reply with price and timing.
Start requestHow the gallery actually tallies a click
Each entry in a Woobox gallery gets its own vote button, and a click adds one tally to that entry while updating a leaderboard the app displays alongside the gallery. What ties a click to a real vote depends on the identifier the organiser configured: a confirmed email address, a Facebook login token, or, for campaigns that skip login entirely, a cookie and IP combination that flags a device rather than a person. Each method catches repeat clicks differently, which is why the same gallery software can feel strict on one campaign and loose on the next.
Vote limits are a setting, not a fixed rule of the app. An organiser can cap voting at once per participant for the life of the gallery, open a daily reset so a supporter can return and click again every day until the contest ends, or require an email opt-in that also adds the voter to the organiser's mailing list before the click is accepted. A CAPTCHA step can be layered on top of any of these to slow down automated clicking, and whether it's switched on is, again, entirely up to whoever built the gallery.
Woobox also runs apps that have nothing to do with public voting: instant-win draws and simple sweepstakes pick a winner at random from a list of entrants, with no gallery and no vote count anywhere in the process. The vote mechanic described here belongs specifically to the Photo Contest and similar gallery-style apps, where visitors choose between entries; confusing the two matters, because a random-draw campaign has no click for anyone to add to in the first place.
Woobox also runs a Tournament app alongside the open gallery, and it counts votes on a completely different structure: two entries face off in a single-elimination bracket, a visitor picks one of the pair, and only the round's winner moves forward to meet the next opponent. A bracket has no single running leaderboard the way an open gallery does, since each round closes on its own schedule before the next one opens, and an entry eliminated early simply stops collecting votes for the rest of the tournament.
An organiser also decides separately whether the running vote count stays visible while a gallery is open. Some galleries show woobox competition votes updating live on a public leaderboard the entire time voting runs, while others hide every number until the contest officially ends and only then publish the final standings. A gallery set to hidden numbers gives no way to check interim standing from outside Woobox's own dashboard, whichever identifier method it uses underneath.
A participant can also submit more than one entry to the same gallery if the organiser allows it, and the vote limit then applies per entry rather than per person overall. The identical email address can back two or three separate entries from the same participant without any of those votes counting as a duplicate against each other, since Woobox tracks the limit against the entry-and-identifier pair, not the participant as a single unit.
Some campaigns skip the gallery page for casual visitors entirely and email a vote link straight to a mailing list; a tap on that link registers as a vote immediately, without the recipient ever opening the gallery itself. Confirmation still runs through the same email address Woobox already uses to identify a voter, so this format changes how a vote arrives, not what counts as one.
A gallery can also let visitors leave a short comment next to the entry they voted for, visible to anyone browsing the page. That comment field is a separate, optional feature layered on top of the vote button; an organiser can turn it on or off, and a missing comment never disqualifies a vote that was otherwise cast correctly.
How an order matches the gallery
We need the exact gallery link and the entry name or number the vote should land on, because Woobox runs many separate galleries at once and there's no way to guess which one an organiser meant. From there, delivery follows whatever the gallery itself accepts as one valid vote — a single click per email address, a login-gated click, or a daily reset — matched against the same identifier method the organiser turned on.
Because several galleries allow a supporter to return and vote again on a reset schedule, delivery is spread across that same window instead of arriving in one pass, which keeps the pattern close to how a real, returning voter would behave. What comes back afterward is the count shown on the gallery's own leaderboard, since Woobox doesn't publish any other number for this format.
A Tournament entry is timed to that specific round's own close instead of one overall contest deadline, since a vote can't reach an entry that's already been eliminated in an earlier round. We confirm whether a link is running as an open gallery or a bracket before scheduling anything against it.
If a gallery hides its running numbers, neither we nor the organiser can confirm interim standing from outside the gallery itself, so what comes back afterward is a screenshot alongside the gallery link and entry name rather than a live number nobody can see until the reveal.
Where this stops
Disqualifying an entry, deleting flagged clicks from the gallery's database, or closing voting early are calls only the organiser or Woobox's own support team can make; this service has no way to reach into that backend and reverse a decision like that. The same boundary applies to any verification step Woobox itself placed in front of the vote button, whether that's a CAPTCHA or an email confirmation link, and this doesn't extend to any gallery tied to a political party, a candidate, or a government agency.
A gallery set to hidden numbers means neither this service nor the organiser can view interim standing before the reveal, and there's no way to speed up a moderation queue an organiser has placed in front of gallery comments or entries. We also can't merge two of a participant's separate entries into one combined vote total after the fact, since Woobox tracks each entry as its own object once it's submitted.
Most public voting contests publish rules that limit votes per account, per person or per IP address, and many prohibit automated or fraudulent voting outright. Some organisers state that votes identified as manipulative are excluded from the count without notice, and that a participant who orders paid votes for a contest can be disqualified. Read the rules before you buy votes for any poll or contest, because the organiser can remove an entry and nobody can prevent that.
Contest platforms watch for clusters: hundreds of votes from one IP address in minutes, or a spike that no real audience would produce. Many organisers also hide live totals until voting closes, which makes a sudden spike easier to spot afterwards. Votes for a contest or poll that arrive at a steady pace, from varied sources, across the whole voting window look like the rest of the traffic the platform already receives.
promosis.com brakto.com ecommercefastlane.com reddit.com producthunt.com
In the United States, legal summaries describe buying votes for a commercial online contest as not inherently illegal, while noting that bots or fake accounts can cross into deceptive-practice territory. In Australia, no specific criminal offence is described for buying contest votes, though the organiser's terms still decide. In the United Kingdom, the Advertising Standards Authority warns promoters about prize contests under the Gambling Act 2005, and in Canada the Competition Act sets disclosure duties for promotional contests. We refuse orders for any public ballot or election.
If we cannot deliver the votes you ordered for your poll or contest, the order is refunded in full. If delivery misses the deadline you set, you can claim a refund instead of the order. The guarantee never covers a result: if the organiser disqualifies your entry or excludes votes from the count, that decision is theirs and no refund or replacement changes it.
Questions
No. It's a separate app that can sit on a Facebook Page tab, run on its own Woobox-hosted page, or be embedded on any website, and it keeps its own vote count regardless of where it's displayed.
It depends entirely on what the organiser configured — some galleries allow one click per email address for the whole run, others reset daily, and a few require a login that limits a supporter to a single, unrepeatable vote.
No. Instant-win and sweepstakes apps pick a winner by random draw with no gallery and no click for anyone to cast, while Photo Contest and similar gallery apps are the ones built around a visible vote count.
Woobox's review process, not this service, decides what happens next. It can pull flagged clicks from the count or lock a gallery early, and there's no way to appeal that decision from outside the app.
Two entries compete head-to-head in a single-elimination bracket, and only the round's winner advances to face the next opponent. Each round closes on its own schedule, so a vote can't reach an entry that's already been eliminated from an earlier round.
Yes, if the organiser allows multiple entries per participant. The vote limit then applies to each entry separately, so the same email address can support several of that participant's own entries without any single vote counting twice.
Last reviewed: